Sprawling transport not up to par

A REPORT comparing the public transport systems of 52 cities internationally, commissioned by the State Government, has found that only North American cities have worse access to services than Melbourne.

And the Public Transport Standards Review, completed by respected transport analysts Booz and Co, has found Melbourne's public transport system performs worse than some Australian capitals in principal areas as well.

The report was completed as part of a government transport statement, released last month, and found eastern European cities invested 137 per cent more in public transport per head of population than Melbourne.

Western European cities invested 57 per cent more.

Only North American cities spent less on public transport per person than Melbourne, according to the report.

Melbourne is one of the developed world's most car-dependent cities, and the study sheds light on why: relatively poor access to public transport because the city is so spread out, and travel times 26 per cent slower than the car.

In cities with excellent public transport systems and worse road congestion — including London, Moscow, Rome and Munich — cars are as much as 50 per cent slower than trains or buses.

Western European cities such as Paris, Bern and Rotterdam had up to 13 times more services per urban hectare than Melbourne, which compared badly because of its vast urban sprawl.

Premier John Brumby last month guaranteed that the sprawl would continue, announcing a planned expansion of the city's growth boundaries on the north-west and south-east fringes...

Read the rest of the article at TheAge.com.au

You can say that again, and again, as spin cycle blows a fuse

Paul Austin

CABINET solidarity is generally a good thing, but this is ridiculous. The final big announcement for 2008 from the Brumby cabinet was last week's $38 billion transport plan. So big was it that it was accompanied by 23 media releases. Yes, 23.

Reading them, a certain similarity becomes apparent. "The Brumby Government is taking action on transport so that Victorians can have the best transport network in Australia," Public Transport Minister Lynne Kosky says in the first release under her name. And in the second. And again in the third, and fourth, and so on until her seventh, on extra transit safety police.

That one has been tweaked subtly: "The Brumby Government is taking action on transport, so that Victorians can have the best and safest transport network in Australia." Kosky's releases Nos. 8, 9 and 10 revert to the original wording.

Then we get to Roads Minister Tim Pallas' releases. It seems he agrees with Kosky, not just in general terms but word for word, because the first of his media statements includes the line: "The Brumby Government is taking action on transport so that Victorians can have the best transport network in Australia." So do the next six, and the ninth.

But Pallas release No. 8, on upgrading bike paths, has a subtle addition: "The Brumby Government is taking action on transport, so that Victorians can have the best transport network in Australia — and the most sustainable." You can see why this Government retains a phalanx of media advisers.

All 10 Kosky releases (except the one about the transit police) go on to say: "Delivering the best transport system in Australia will mean Victorians can spend less time commuting and more time with family and friends."

So do Pallas' nine releases, except the one about removing trucks from residential streets around Yarraville, and the one about the bike paths, which contains a mistake: "Delivering the best transport system in Australia will mean Victorians have more can spend less time commuting and more time with family and friends."

Each Kosky release includes this boast: "Our $38 billion action plan also will generate up to 10,000 jobs a year during construction, resulting in more than 100,000 jobs over the life of the plan."

Pallas says exactly the same thing in each of his releases, except the one about the bike paths, the one about getting trucks off the streets of the inner west (which inserts the word "transport" before "action plan"), and the one about the Frankston bypass (which drops the word "also").

Most of Pallas' releases then say: "In tougher global times, the Brumby Government is taking action to deliver thousands of jobs now and to build for our next era of prosperity." So do half of Kosky's. That line also appears in one of their two joint media releases, under Kosky's name. Perhaps she got to say it because she's the more senior minister, at least for now.

(Incidentally, it's not just Labor that plays this game. Ted Baillieu, or at least someone in or around his office, came up with a good line last Thursday about the Government's record on public transport: "A public transport system ought to run like a Swiss watch. But we've got a cuckoo clock. John Brumby's transport system runs like a cuckoo clock." Baillieu's loyal upper house leader, David Davis, was so impressed that he said it again the next day: "Our transport system should work like a Swiss watch. Instead of that, it's working like a cuckoo clock.")

Underneath the tedious rhetoric, many of those 23 media releases on the Brumby transport plan announce welcome projects.

For example, one of the joint Kosky/Pallas releases is about a promise to spend $440 million over the next 12 years to eliminate some level crossings. This is a program that will save not only time but lives.

"With even more train services to be added across the network over coming years and more vehicles expected on key arterial roads, the Government must separate rail and road in key locations," Labor explains. But how many level crossings will be eliminated under this plan? Well, "a number". Which ones? There is not a clue, beyond the first: Springvale Road, Nunawading. How much will that one cost? We are not told, beyond the fact that "the Commonwealth Government has committed $80 million towards the project".

There's one other aspect of the transport plan where detail has evaded the Premier. Asked the cost of the advertising campaign that is on your TV screen right now spruiking the benefits of his blueprint, Brumby replied: "Look, I don't have the exact figure. I think it's somewhere between 1 and 2 million dollars."

Somewhere between 1 and 2 million? This from the Premier who can tell us that over the next 12 years the metro rail tunnel will cost $4.5 billion, the so-called regional rail link $4 billion, the Dingley bypass $80 million, the restoration of passenger rail services to Maryborough $50 million, planning for an outer ring road $10 million, and a study of what to do about Hoddle Street $5 million.

No doubt if Lynne Kosky or Tim Pallas were asked how much the advertising campaign for their transport plan was costing us taxpayers, they'd say the same thing as the Premier. Cabinet solidarity, you see.

Read the original article at TheAge.com.au

Melburnians fare badly when paying for public transport - TheAge

MELBOURNE'S public transport is again the country's most expensive, after the Brumby Government announced the biggest price increase in fares in five years.

Public Transport Minister Lynne Kosky confirmed on Friday that train, tram and bus fares will jump by 5 per cent from January 1.

With tickets up by as much as $2.20 (for a zone one and two weekly ticket), the Public Transport Users Association has compared Melbourne's fares with other Australian cities.

Melbourne fared badly, with the price of a ticket far higher in all but two cases.

Melbourne is the most expensive city for all journeys, except short trips in Adelaide, and for trips longer than 40 kilometres, since the Government abolished zone three for the outer suburbs last year.

"In extreme cases, Melbourne costs 50 per cent more than some cities," said Public Transport Users Association president Daniel Bowen.

For a 20-kilometre single trip in Melbourne — for example, from Clayton to Flinders Street — passengers will from next year pay $5.80 (a rise of 30 cents). For a trip of the same length in Brisbane, passengers pay $3.80.

Ms Kosky, defending last week's price rise, said it was not true that Melbourne had the country's most expensive tickets.

But the PTUA said the figures spoke for themselves.

"The bulk of commuters are paying more per kilometre than passengers anywhere in Australia," Mr Bowen said.

The 5 per cent fare increase that will hit passengers next year is separate from another two increases with which they will be slugged in 2012 and 2013.

Those rises will help to finance the state's $38 billion Victorian transport statement...

Read the rest of the article at TheAge.com.au